|
|
Beginning
1
|
Developing
2
|
Accomplished
3
|
Exemplary
4
|
Poss.
Score
|
|
Diary
contains five entries written with style and sufficient content
to relate a series of events
|
The diary
entries are partially complete, do not convey a sense of understanding
of the time period, or event. There
is no evidence of style, or of a story being told.
|
A minimum of
three diary entries are contained in the final project; the diary
entries are only minimally successful in use of point of view,
|
All Diary
entries are present in the final project, but may contain limited use of
style, point of view, or do not cover five consecutive days during the
Civil War.
|
All five entries
are contained in final project, are written in a constant style, and
tell a complete story from the character’s point of view over the
course of five days during the Civil War.
|
30
|
|
Diary
entries contained a minimum of ten historically accurate facts
|
Less than five
historically accurate facts are present but unsuccessfully placed into a
narrative that may or may not exist.
The events are not supported by notecards.
|
The student has
less than 7 historically accurate facts, and has attempted to
incorporate these into the narrative and may or may not have support
from notecards.
|
The student has
a minimum of ten historically accurate facts (details), and has not
incorporated these facts into the narrative fluently.
Notecards supporting research are present
|
The student has
ten historically accurate facts (details), has successfully incorporated
these into the narrative of the diary entries, and has presented these facts on notecards accompanying the
final project.
|
30
|
|
Diary
entries show evidence of connecting to the time period through emotion
|
There are some
reactions that may or may not be tied into the event described in the
journal entries. An attempt
has been made to reflect back on the diaries activities
|
Some adjectives
are used but are ineffectively tied into the diary entries.
There is a reflection, but it does not seem to be tied into the
writing smoothly.
|
The reader sees
minimal evidence of the character’s reactions in the diary entries.
There are some adjectives, but they are not strong or plentiful.
There is minimal evidence of character reflection in the writing.
|
The reader sees
real and dramatic evidence of the character’s reactions to what has
happened in the diary entries. Strong
adjectives are used to describe the events.
There is evidence of reflection in the writing.
|
20
|
|
Diary
entries show evidence of understanding different language
devices
|
There are
frequent spelling mistakes due to lack of proofreading that leave the
reader confused and do not lend to the authenticity and reality of the
diary entries.
|
The writer has
attempted to create a pattern of spelling and dialect that is based more
on the writer’s own knowledge than research of the time period.
|
There is a
pattern of spelling and dialect that seems researched but is not used
continuously and therefore does not lend to the authenticity and reality
of the diary entries.
|
The writer of
the diary has a definite understanding of how to use dialect and
spelling conventions to convey a sense of reality and authenticity to
the diary entries.
|
10
|
|
The
overall presentation of the
diary resembles something historical
|
Diary entries
were written yesterday and are in pencil
|
This diary was
buried last week, but the entries are in ink.
|
This diary is in
ink and an attempt to age the paper has been made (maybe it was found
after 20 years of being buried)
|
This diary was
found after 140 years of being buried.
The writing is in ink and the paper is worn.
|
10
|